8 Minutes
Editor's note: spoilers ahead for The Buccaneers Season 2 finale
Introduction — A surprising twist that shifted everything
The final moments of The Buccaneers Season 2 delivered a punch few viewers saw coming: Paloma (Grace Ambrose) is revealed to be holding the annulment papers that would free Guy from his unwanted marriage. Instead of handing them over, she keeps them hidden—effectively trapping him and upending the budding relationship between Guy and Nan. For a character introduced as an open-hearted foil to the show's more conventional heroines, Paloma's abrupt turn into antagonist felt jarring. On a show about class, love, and social navigation in period romance drama, this heel turn raises questions about character integrity, representation, and narrative fairness.
Plot summary — What led us to the reveal
From friendly landlady to confidante
Paloma starts as Jinny (Imogen Waterhouse) and Guy's affable Italian landlady. She quickly becomes woven into their daily lives, offering support and a sympathetic ear. When Jinny’s backstory — fleeing an abusive marriage — comes to light, Paloma appears unequivocally compassionate. She keeps secrets, comforts Guy, and seems to embody a more carefree approach to romance than the show’s other women.
The drink, the ring, and the crossing of lines
In Episode 5 of Season 2, a drunken night leads to an intimate encounter between Guy and Paloma. The scene felt like a breath of fresh air: Guy finally experiences a momentary escape from the cycles of longing and rejection that had defined him. Paloma insists she wants something casual, but the discovery of a wedding ring on her finger at episode's end suggests the relationship may have deepened beyond her stated intentions.
The finale twist
When Paloma arrives in England by Guy’s side, she continues to present as laid-back and friendly toward Nan. But the finale flips the script: Paloma is in possession of the annulment papers and withholds them. The revelation recasts earlier scenes and forces viewers to re-evaluate Paloma’s motives and the show's representation of desire and agency.
Cast and crew — Performances that anchored the series
The Buccaneers owes much of its emotional texture to a committed cast. Grace Ambrose’s Paloma is charismatic and nuanced in the episodes that precede the finale; Imogen Waterhouse’s Jinny and other supporting players create a layered ensemble that brings the period romance drama to life. The series’ costume design, cinematography, and production design contribute to the immersive period atmosphere, making the emotional stakes feel immediate.
While the writers and creative team crafted rich interpersonal dynamics, the finale’s decision to shift Paloma’s arc into duplicity has been divisive among critics and fans alike. The turn has particular resonance because it changes how viewers read scenes retroactively: what once felt free-spirited now smacks of manipulation.
Production details — Crafting a period romance on screen
The Buccaneers is a visually sumptuous Apple TV+ production that leans into traditional period-drama hallmarks: carefully tailored costumes, stately interiors, and a score that accentuates longing and social tension. The series mixes intimate character moments with broader social commentary on class and gender in late 19th-century Europe. Production design and costume teams deserve credit for creating a world that feels lived-in and cinematic—qualities that make character betrayals all the more painful for the audience.
Critical reception — Praise, critique, and cultural conversation
Reception to Season 2 has been mixed. Critics praised the performances, the production values, and the way the drama probes class and desire. But the finale twist sparked debate. Many viewers felt the transformation of Paloma from sympathetic ally to secret-keeper was abrupt and underexplained. Some critics have noted that the change plays into tired tropes—particularly the stereotype of the duplicitous, passionate ‘‘Latin lover’’—and argued that it erases an alternative model of feminine agency that Paloma seemed to represent.
The decision to reduce a character who offered a different way of being to mere plot fuel also triggered conversations about representation in period drama: when shows cut short or villainize less conventional female characters, they limit the range of experiences onscreen.
Why Paloma’s turn feels problematic
Narratively, Paloma’s betrayal feels like a shortcut. It converts a richly drawn supporting character into a device that prolongs the central love triangle between Guy and Nan—at the cost of emotional honesty and character complexity. The problem is twofold: first, the motivation for Paloma’s action is not sufficiently rooted in backstory or psychology; second, the move reinforces stereotypes rather than subverting them.
For a global audience attuned to character-driven storytelling, this kind of twist needs more scaffolding. If writers intend to make Paloma morally ambiguous, they must invest screen time in exploring her fears, cultural pressures, and internal contradictions. Without that, the payoff feels punitive rather than revelatory.
How Season 3 could redeem Paloma
If Apple TV+ renews The Buccaneers for Season 3, there’s a genuine opportunity to restore depth to Paloma’s arc. Redemption doesn’t mean turning her into a paragon—it means making her believable and human. Here are narrative paths that would preserve the character’s integrity while maintaining drama:
- Provide psychological context: flashbacks or conversations that reveal why Paloma fears abandonment, scandal, or social exile.
- Avoid reductive tropes: resist the easy label of ‘‘homewrecker’’ and explore cultural and economic pressures that shape her choices.
- Give Paloma agency outside of romantic rivalry: let her pursue independent aims, friendships, or a storyline that expands her identity beyond others’ relationships.
- Consequences and growth: show her confronting the impact of her decision and making amends, not as a perfunctory apology but as a believable transformation.
Personal take — Why viewers deserve better
Paloma’s original charm came from being unconventional: she offered a lighter, less marriage-obsessed perspective that contrasted productively with the show’s more traditional heroines. Turning her into a secret-keeper strips away a rare representation of feminine autonomy in period drama. As fans of cinematic storytelling and serialized television, we value characters who evolve honestly. Season 3 could—and should—treat Paloma as a person in her own right rather than an obstacle in someone else’s romance.
Conclusion — A plea for nuance and bold storytelling
The Buccaneers remains a compelling romance drama with striking visuals and strong performances. But the finale’s decision to recast Paloma risks flattening one of the series’ most interesting figures. If the show returns, writers have a chance to deepen the narrative, explore moral ambiguity with honesty, and restore complexity to Paloma’s character. Fans of period drama and character-driven television will be watching—not just to see who ends up with whom, but to see if the series can deliver the psychological insight it initially promised.
Key takeaways
- Paloma’s Season 2 heel turn surprised and divided viewers.
- The character once offered an alternative model of feminine agency in a period romance drama.
- Season 3 could redeem Paloma by providing motive, growth, and agency beyond the love triangle.
- Strong casting and production values make the show worth salvaging; what’s needed now is nuanced writing that respects character complexity.
Comments