6 Minutes
Eugene Levy hasn't seen Dan's 'kernel of an idea' yet
Eugene Levy, whose unmistakable presence helped make Schitt’s Creek a global phenomenon, recently admitted he hasn't been filled in on the reboot talking points reportedly circulating around his son and co-creator Dan Levy. Speaking on NBC's Today segment 'Girl Code', Eugene joked that he doesn't even have Instagram, which helps explain why Dan's so-called "kernel of an idea" for a new iteration of the show hasn't landed in his lap. The remark landed with a lightheartedness that has become part of the Levy family public persona — warm, self-aware, and protective of the original series' integrity.
Schitt’s Creek concluded its six-season run in 2020 with widespread acclaim and a sweep at the 2020 Emmys. The series remains a streaming success, and fans' calls for a revival or feature film have only intensified in the years since. Dan Levy, who won Emmys for writing and directing in addition to acting honors, has acknowledged thinking about potential continuations — but insists any return must feel necessary, authentic, and true to where the characters ended.
From sitcom to cultural touchstone
By the time the series signed off, Schitt’s Creek had evolved from a modest Canadian sitcom into a cultural touchstone for inclusive storytelling and character-driven comedy. The Roses’ arc — from wealthy outsiders to community fixtures — resonated in part because the show avoided easy melodrama, choosing instead to build compassion and depth into its ensemble. That tonal discipline is one reason both Levys have been cautious about revisiting the material: a reboot that undermines what made the original special could alienate the very audience it aims to please.
There are two obvious pathways if a revival happens: a feature film that reassembles the cast for one definitive story, or a limited series that continues character threads at a measured pace. Eugene Levy himself reacted favorably to the movie idea when prompted, saying it "gets me excited" and that one should "never say never." This reaction mirrors a wider industry trend where high-profile television properties return as feature films — think Arrested Development’s theatrical targeting or Sex and the City’s leap to film — though results have been mixed.
Industry context and reboot trends
The streaming era has created a strong economic incentive to reboot beloved shows. Platforms chase proven IP to drive subscriptions, while audiences often seek nostalgia mixed with new cultural commentary. Yet, creators increasingly push back against purely commercial revivals; Dan Levy’s public insistence on finding the "right" idea reflects a broader pattern where showrunners want continuity and artistic justification rather than a simple cash grab.
Comparatively, some revivals — like the darker, more serialized revivals of Twin Peaks or Transparent’s later-season metamorphosis — show that a tonal shift can work if carefully handled. Schitt's Creek’s trademark optimism suggests any return would likely preserve its compassionate comedic voice rather than pivot toward grit. That creative constraint is both limiting and protective: it prevents cheap returns and preserves the show’s legacy.
Behind the scenes, awards, and fan reaction
Fans remain vocal on social media and in fan forums, where speculation about where each character might be five years later runs rampant. Trivia-minded viewers often note that Schitt’s Creek achieved an Emmy sweep in 2020 — a rare feat — including Outstanding Comedy Series, and acting and writing wins for Eugene and Dan Levy. Dan has hinted about writing possibilities during late-night appearances, but the show's co-creators have repeatedly emphasized that any reunion needs a story that "starts kind of on the level where we left off." Meaning: no retconning, no cheap cliffhangers resurrected for shock value.
Behind the camera, the chemistry among the original cast and creative team remains a valuable asset. In reunion projects, the logistical puzzle — aligning schedules, budgets, and creative priorities — is often as challenging as the storytelling choice. Eugene Levy’s concurrent projects, like his travel series The Reluctant Traveler, demonstrate the actors’ busy post-Schitt’s Creek careers and underscore why a deliberate timetable for a revival makes sense.
Critical perspective and what fans should expect
A revival or movie could deepen the franchise’s cultural imprint if it adheres to the show’s core strengths: empathetic character work, sharp but gentle satire, and a tone that rewards character growth over shock value. A weaker return would likely be oversaturated with callbacks and fan service, which could dilute the original’s magic. Industry watchers point out that the best revivals are those that treat continuation as narrative evolution rather than brand exploitation.
"Schitt’s Creek succeeded because it earned its emotional payoffs through meticulous character work," says film critic Anna Kovacs. "Any revival needs to preserve that discipline; otherwise, it risks becoming a pastiche. If Dan and Eugene Levy opt to return, they should do so with restraint and narrative purpose."
Movie, limited series or one-off? The creative choices
A feature film offers a concentrated way to bring closure or new beginnings: it’s a single artistic statement, easier to market and to attract wider theatrical audiences. A limited series, however, can explore subtle developments — marriages, career shifts, community-politics in Schitt’s Creek — without forcing a blockbuster-scale plot. The Levys' repeated caveats about waiting for the "right idea" suggest they are weighing those options carefully.
Until concrete plans surface, the most likely outcome remains cautious optimism. Eugene Levy’s public comments — humorous, memory-rich, and careful — signal that the Levys value the series’ legacy and will move forward only when a meaningful story presents itself.
A final note: for fans of smart, empathetic comedy, a return from Schitt’s Creek that honors the world it created would be welcome. But the Levys’ restraint is an encouraging sign that if the show does come back, it will do so on its own thoughtful terms.
Source: deadline
Leave a Comment