3 Minutes
Symbiotic’s shared security model explained
Shared security protocols are gaining attention as a practical solution to infrastructure hurdles that have slowed large-scale institutional blockchain adoption. Symbiotic CEO Misha Putiatin argues that a unified security layer — where participants stake assets to secure a common validation layer — can lower development costs and remove technical barriers for enterprises building on multiple chains.
What is shared security?
At its core, shared security is a reusable, security-focused layer that multiple applications and blockchains can leverage. Instead of each project creating its own validator set, staking mechanisms, and verification tools from scratch, organizations can rely on an established set of operators and primitives to validate consensus results across networks.
Benefits for multi-chain enterprise deployments
Putiatin describes the main advantage as immediate scalability: institutions can tap into existing operator sets and security infrastructure to accelerate deployment. For example, assets staked on Ethereum could provide validation power for applications running on Solana, enabling consistent proof-of-consensus without duplicating verification stacks. This unified approach could streamline the rollout of liquidity protocols, cross-chain bridges, oracle systems, and other DeFi products that enterprises are increasingly exploring.
Addressing cross-chain verification challenges
Traditional cross-chain methods each carry trade-offs. Trusted messenger systems require allowlisting and off-chain agreements, while light clients need heavy development and continued maintenance. Shared security aims to sit between those extremes by enabling consensus verification across ecosystems, reducing engineering overhead and ongoing operational costs.
Centralization risks and safeguards
Critics warn that unified layers could create systemic single points of failure if not carefully designed. Putiatin highlights architectural approaches that preserve network autonomy: some shared-security frameworks allow individual chains to retain control over validator selection, staking policies, and governance. Upgrade paths can be opt-in, giving connected networks the choice to adopt changes instead of being forced into protocol updates.
Implications for institutional adoption
Financial institutions are balancing public network deployments with bespoke blockchain development based on compliance needs and technical specs. Shared security offers a middle ground — customization without full infrastructure rebuilds. Ultimately, the success of unified security layers in driving institutional adoption will depend on balancing standardization benefits with the flexibility institutions need for governance and regulatory compliance.
Comments