6 Minutes
The protein conversation: hype versus need
High-protein diets and protein powders remain popular on social media and in grocery aisles. Brands highlight protein grams on packaging and influencers promote shakes and supplements as a fast route to better muscle, recovery or satiety. But more protein is not always better. This article explains how much protein most adults need, when higher amounts make sense, and what physiological and health consequences can follow from chronically excessive protein intake.
How much protein do people actually need?
Protein is essential: its amino acids build and repair muscle, form enzymes and hormones, support immune responses and can serve as an energy source. Dietary guidelines provide practical targets rather than exact prescriptions for every individual. In Australia, guidelines advise that protein should supply roughly 15–25% of daily energy. For adults, average population reference intakes are about 0.84 g/kg body weight per day for men and 0.75 g/kg for women.
That equates to roughly 76 g/day for a 90 kg man and about 53 g/day for a 70 kg woman. Older adults and children have different needs, and athletes engaged in resistance training can benefit from higher intakes—up to approximately 1.6 g/kg/day—when combined with structured strength training. For example, a 90 kg trainee might aim for about 144 g/day while actively increasing muscle mass. Beyond that level, randomized trials and meta-analyses show little additional gain in muscle size or strength.
What happens when you eat more protein than you need?
Excess dietary protein is not simply flushed away. The body metabolizes surplus amino acids: the nitrogen component is converted to urea and excreted via urine, while remaining carbon skeletons can be oxidized for energy or converted to fat when total calorie intake exceeds needs. Chronically consuming more calories than you burn—regardless of macronutrient source—tends to increase adipose tissue (body fat) over time.
Certain health situations require careful protein management. People with advanced chronic kidney disease often need individualized protein targets to avoid exacerbating renal stress; such adjustments should be made by a registered dietitian in consultation with nephrology care. Another extreme condition, historically called 'protein poisoning' or 'rabbit starvation', occurs when a diet is almost exclusively lean protein with insufficient fats and carbohydrates, leading to severe illness. Early 20th-century accounts, including explorer Vilhjalmur Stefansson's reports, described rapid decline in people subsisting on very lean meat choices.
Protein sources matter: plant versus animal
Not all protein sources carry the same health trade-offs. Animal proteins—meat, full-fat dairy and some processed products—often bring higher levels of saturated fat and, with very high intake in older adults, have been associated in cohort studies with increased risks of certain cancers and higher all-cause mortality. High animal-protein diets have also been linked to greater incidence of type 2 diabetes in some populations.
By contrast, plant proteins from legumes, lentils, whole grains, nuts and seeds tend to come with dietary fiber, unsaturated fats and a broader set of phytonutrients. Diets that emphasize plant proteins are associated with improved blood cholesterol profiles, lower risk of type 2 diabetes and reduced risk of some cancers. Increasing plant-based protein can therefore deliver cardiovascular and metabolic benefits while helping meet protein needs.
Balancing macronutrients
Protein works in concert with fats and carbohydrates. Removing or severely limiting other macronutrients in favor of very high protein intake can create nutrient imbalances and reduce dietary fiber intake—an important factor for gut health and chronic disease prevention. For population health and longevity, balance and food quality matter more than chasing high protein totals alone.
Expert Insight
Dr. Elena Morales, a clinical dietitian and science communicator, notes: 'Protein is vital, but context is everything. For most adults, meeting guideline levels and focusing on diverse, minimally processed sources—especially plants—will support health without the downsides linked to excessive animal-protein patterns. Those training intensely can temporarily increase protein intake, but they rarely need the extreme amounts promoted by marketing.' Her practical advice: 'Track overall calories and include healthy fats and carbohydrates; if you have kidney disease or other chronic conditions, check with your clinician before changing protein intake significantly.'
Implications, technologies and future prospects
Public interest in protein has spurred innovations: precision nutrition tools, apps that estimate personalized protein needs, plant-based meat analogues engineered to match the texture and amino acid profiles of animal products, and lab-grown proteins aimed at reducing saturated fat and environmental impacts of livestock. Continued research will refine protein recommendations for diverse groups—older adults, pregnant people, athletes and those with chronic disease—using biomarkers and controlled trials to move beyond population averages.
Conclusion
Protein is an indispensable macronutrient, but more is not automatically better. For most adults, consuming protein within recommended ranges—emphasizing plant sources and maintaining macronutrient balance—supports health, reduces chronic disease risk and avoids wasteful excess calories. Higher protein intakes can benefit people engaged in targeted resistance training, but there is a ceiling beyond which no further muscle gains are observed and potential harms may increase. If you have a medical condition such as chronic kidney disease, seek tailored advice from health professionals before raising protein intake.
Comments